What Is the Ruling on Accusing a Man or Woman of Sexual Indecency?
ما حكم اتهام الناس بالفاحشة رجلا كان المتهم أو امرأة؟
What is the ruling on accusing a person of indecency whether it is a man or a woman?
Islam strictly forbids accusing any person of indecency or adultery without producing four direct eyewitnesses. Falsely accusing someone of this sin is a major crime (Qadhf) punishable by eighty lashes and the permanent rejection of the accuser's testimony, unless they sincerely repent.
The severity of preserving honor and reputation in Islam is so high that the law heavily penalizes rumors, gossip, and unfounded accusations of immorality.
Why does Islam require exactly four witnesses for accusations of indecency?
This extremely high standard of proof is designed specifically to protect people's honor and reputations. It makes it practically impossible to publicly accuse someone without absolute, undeniable proof, thereby preventing malicious rumors from destroying families.
What happens if the accuser actually saw the act happen but has no other witnesses?
A single eyewitness cannot establish the four-witness proof that zina requires, and may not publicly accuse the person. Islam encourages concealing a Muslim's faults: "Whoever conceals a Muslim, Allah will conceal him on the Day of Resurrection" (Sahih al-Bukhari 2442). Exposing the sin without the required three additional witnesses makes the person legally liable for slander, and they will receive the punishment for Qadhf.
What are the consequences of committing Qadhf (slander)?
The accuser receives the Hadd punishment of eighty lashes, they are publicly deemed rebellious (Fasiq), and they lose their legal right to testify as a witness in any future matters forever, unless they sincerely repent to Allah.
The Crime of Slander (Qadhf)
1. The Strict Requirement of Proof
It is forbidden to accuse people of indecency even if someone sees another with his own eyes committing immorality unless he brings four witnesses to testify with him.
2. The Punishment for Slander
But if there is no one to testify with him, then his punishment will be eighty lashes. This is the hadd punishment for one who slanders a chaste person. Furthermore, their testimony will never again be accepted, unless they repent and ask forgiveness after that, then Allah accepts their repentance.
The Quranic Command
(Those who accuse chaste women of adultery and fail to produce four witnesses, give them eighty lashes each. And do not ever accept any testimony from them, for they are indeed the rebellious except those who repent afterwards and mend their ways, then surely Allah is All Forgiving, Most Merciful.) Surah An Nur 24: 4 to 5.
(Surely those who accuse chaste, unsuspecting, believing women are cursed in this life and the Hereafter. And they will suffer a tremendous punishment.) Surah An Nur 24: 23.
Scholarly Insight: In Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh), the crime of slander (Qadhf) was instituted to protect society from scandals and character assassination. By requiring a stringent standard of proof (four righteous eyewitnesses to the actual act), Islam practically closes the door on public accusations of adultery. This ensures that people's reputations are safeguarded and public modesty is maintained. Scholars explain that even if a person witnesses the act alone, they must cover the sin and remain silent. Exposing it without the three other required witnesses makes the observer legally guilty of slander, highlighting Islam's priority to protect the honor of individuals over spreading scandals.
ما حكم اتهام الناس بالفاحشة رجلا كان المتهم أو امرأة؟
يحرم الإسلام تحريما قاطعا اتهام أي شخص بالفاحشة أو الزنا دون إحضار أربعة شهود عيان. ويعتبر الاتهام الباطل جريمة كبرى (قذف) يعاقب عليها بثمانين جلدة ورفض شهادة القاذف بشكل دائم، إلا إذا تاب توبة نصوحا.
إن شدة الحفاظ على الشرف والسمعة في الإسلام عالية جدا لدرجة أن الشريعة تعاقب بشدة على الشائعات والقيل والقال والاتهامات الباطلة بالفاحشة.
جريمة القذف
1. اشتراط الدليل القاطع
يحرم اتهام الناس بالفاحشة ولو رأى من يفعل الفاحشة بعينيه ولم يكن معه أحد لم يجز له اتهامه، ما لم يأت بأربعة شهداء يشهدون.
2. عقوبة القذف
عقوبته أنه يجلد 80 جلدة (حد القذف). كما أنهم لن تقبل شهادتهم أبدا، إلا إذا تابوا واستغفروا بعد ذلك فالله يتوب عليهم.
الأمر القرآني
(وَالَّذِينَ يَرْمُونَ الْمُحْصَنَاتِ ثُمَّ لَمْ يَأْتُوا بِأَرْبَعَةِ شُهَدَاءَ فَاجْلِدُوهُمْ ثَمَانِينَ جَلْدَةً وَلَا تَقْبَلُوا لَهُمْ شَهَادَةً أَبَدًا ۚ وَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ ﴿٤﴾ إِلَّا الَّذِينَ تَابُوا مِن بَعْدِ ذَٰلِكَ وَأَصْلَحُوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ ﴿٥﴾) النور 24: 4 إلى 5.
(إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَرْمُونَ الْمُحْصَنَاتِ الْغَافِلَاتِ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ لُعِنُوا فِي الدُّنْيَا وَالْآخِرَةِ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ ﴿٢٣﴾) النور 24: 23.
1. The Crime of Slander (Qadhf) and Its Severe Penalty | جريمة القذف وعقوبتها الرادعة: ثمانون جلدة
Islamic law constructs an impregnable fortress around human honor. Slandering a chaste person with accusations of fornication incurs the prescribed criminal penalty (Hadd) when a competent court establishes its legal conditions: "And those who accuse chaste women and then do not produce four witnesses, lash them with eighty lashes" (24:4).
فَاجْلِدُوهُمْ ثَمَانِينَ جَلْدَةً وَلَا تَقْبَلُوا لَهُمْ شَهَادَةً أَبَدًا (سورة النور: 4)
حاط الإسلام أعراض الناس بسياج منيع من الحماية والقداسة؛ فجعل رمي المحصنين أو المحصنات بالفاحشة جريمة كبرى تستوجب حدا شرعيا معلوما في سورة النور: {وَالَّذِينَ يَرْمُونَ الْمُحْصَنَاتِ ثُمَّ لَمْ يَأْتُوا بِأَرْبَعَةِ شُهَدَاءَ فَاجْلِدُوهُمْ ثَمَانِينَ جَلْدَةً} (سورة النور: 4)؛ ردعا للألسن الخائضة في الأعراض.
2. The Stringent Evidentiary Standard: Four Direct Eyewitnesses | اشتراط أربعة شهود عدول لإثبات الفاحشة
Witness evidence for zina requires four upright eyewitnesses who testify to the same act; other matters have their own evidentiary rules. A judge assesses their testimony and the conditions for Qadhf. Al-Shafi'i records Umar's treatment of the three witnesses in the case of Al-Mughirah when the testimony of a fourth did not establish zina.
ثُمَّ لَمْ يَأْتُوا بِأَرْبَعَةِ شُهَدَاءَ (سورة النور: 4)
يشترط لإثبات الزنا بالشهادة أربعة شهود عدول رأوا الواقعة نفسها عيانا، ويفحص القاضي شهاداتهم وشروط حد القذف. ويذكر الشافعي في الأم خبر عمر مع الشهود الثلاثة في قضية المغيرة حين لم تثبت شهادة الرابع الزنا؛ فالتشريع يصون الأعراض ويمنع اتهام الناس بغير بينة شرعية.
3. Civic Disqualification: Permanent Rejection of Testimony | رد الشهادة والحكم بالفسق صيانة لعدالة القضاء
Beyond corporal lashing, the slanderer suffers civil disenfranchisement: "and do not accept their testimony ever, and those are the defiantly disobedient" (24:4). This protects the reliability of court testimony, while the effect of subsequent repentance follows the applicable school ruling.
وَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ إِلَّا الَّذِينَ تَابُوا مِن بَعْدِ ذَٰلِكَ وَأَصْلَحُوا (سورة النور: 4-5)
تتجاوز عقوبة القاذف العقوبة البدنية إلى نزع الأهلية المدنية؛ فيحرم من شرف قبول شهادته في القضاء والمعاملات أبدا: {وَلَا تَقْبَلُوا لَهُمْ شَهَادَةً أَبَدًا ۚ وَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ} (سورة النور: 4)؛ حماية لعدالة الشهادة وصيانة لكرامة الناس؛ وللتوبة أثرها الفقهي بحسب المذهب.
4. Repentance and Moral Reformation | التوبة والإصلاح وسقوط وصف الفسق
The Quran provides a path of spiritual redemption: "Except for those who repent thereafter and reform, for indeed Allah is Forgiving and Merciful" (24:5). Repentance and reform remove the description of unrighteousness. The majority, including the Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali schools, accept a reformed slanderer's testimony once its conditions are fulfilled; the Hanafi school continues to reject the testimony of a person punished for Qadhf even after repentance.
إِلَّا الَّذِينَ تَابُوا مِن بَعْدِ ذَٰلِكَ وَأَصْلَحُوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ (سورة النور: 5)
فتح الله تعالى باب الرحمة والتدارك: {إِلَّا الَّذِينَ تَابُوا مِن بَعْدِ ذَٰلِكَ وَأَصْلَحُوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ} (سورة النور: 5)؛ فإذا تاب القاذف وأصلح زال وصف الفسق؛ وتقبل شهادته بعد تحقق شروطها عند جمهور المالكية والشافعية والحنابلة، بينما يستمر رد شهادة المحدود في القذف عند الحنفية ولو تاب. وتقتضي التوبة إصلاح ما أفسده في عرض من قذفه.
Scholarly Insight: The four-witness requirement for Qadhf demonstrates that Islamic criminal jurisprudence intentionally prefers concealment (Satr) of private moral failings over public scandal and character assassination. Read more in the tafsir of Surah An-Nur.
Frequently Asked Questions | الأسئلة الشائعة
What is the penalty for accusing someone of indecency without four witnesses?
For Qadhf against a chaste person, eighty lashes, rejection of testimony, and the judgment of unrighteousness apply when the legal conditions are met (Surah An-Nur 24:4); repentance removes unrighteousness and restores testimony eligibility according to the majority.
Why does Islam require four eyewitnesses instead of the usual two?
To make frivolous accusations nearly impossible and protect people's reputations and honor from gossip.
What happens if three witnesses testify to indecency but the fourth cannot confirm it?
The judge examines whether Qadhf and its conditions are established. Al-Shafi'i records that Umar punished the three witnesses in Al-Mughirah's case when the fourth testimony did not establish zina.
Does the prohibition of Qadhf apply only when slandering women?
No, it applies equally to slandering men or women with accusations of adultery or fornication.
Prepared by Eng. Ghada Homad, founder of IslamFAQ, researched and written in consultation with qualified scholars, reviewed by Professor Khaled Jassem Al-Houli, Associate Professor of Comparative Jurisprudence and Islamic Politics, Faculty of Sharia and Islamic Studies, University of Kuwait. Read more about the authors and this project →